Read time: 3 minutes 43 seconds

We’re about 2-3 months away from looking like a COMPLETELY different business.

2 massive launches planned.

1 will lift our revenue ceiling by 3-4x.

1 will fundamentally change the business model.

Both have been dreams of mine for years. Wild to see them come to life.

Can’t wait to share more very soon.

Reply with your guesses πŸ‘€

β€” Tom

You read how Attio works. Now put it to work.

Our recent Attio breakdown covered the strategy; this is the product. Attio is the CRM where agents run alongside your team: researching accounts, drafting follow-ups, surfacing what buyers are saying, and moving work forward on their own.

Every customer signal turns into your next move, which is what go-to-market velocity actually looks like in practice. It's free to try.

Is your roadmap a list of features or a strategy for outcomes?"

Most product teams have plenty of feedback – it’s just scattered across Slack, call notes, and support tickets. Jira Product Discovery (JPD) brings that evidence into one place so you can stop debating opinions, and start prioritizing based on customer data.

Connect your roadmap directly to Jira and show exactly why you’re building something.

Thank you for supporting our sponsors, who keep this newsletter free.

Why Airpods are actually a subscription

Chess Move

The what: A TLDR explanation of the strategy

Bloomberg Intelligence put AirPods at roughly $22 billion in revenue for 2024, up 22% year on year, and around $18 billion a year every year since 2021.

Spin that out as a standalone company and that would make rank AirPods #199 on the Fortune 500.

Apple's Wearables, Home and Accessories segment boasts $35.7 billion in FY2025 and would be #129.

And the product only launched in December 2016.

It’s easy to think AirPods look like a one-time hardware sale, but data shows they’re more like a subscription.

You pay $250 once β†’ then the atrophy begins…

β†’ The battery degrades hard after about 2 years of daily charging.

β†’ It's glued in with no user-serviceable swap

Every generation is "essentially disposable by design."

AirPods are a one-off purchase, but are engineered to recur.

πŸ’‘

Strategy Playbook: Sell hardware on a cycle.

Breakdown

The how: The strategic playbook boiled down to 3x key takeaways

1. Β Engineered to expire, not to break

The lithium coin-cell in every pair loses meaningful capacity after about 2 years of daily cycles, and Apple has glued it in since generation 1.

❝

β€œthe coin-cell battery is glued down so firmly that only heat, tweezers, and a lot of luck will free it”.

- iFixit's AirPods Pro 3 teardown (October 2025), which gave it 0/10 for repairability.

scene of the crime.

You can't cheaply fix the one part that wears out because Apple's battery-service price sits awkwardly close enough to a new pair that most people just re-buy.

And people do re-buy, reliably.

Compute the cost for yourself and ask - β€œwould I pay for a new battery after 2 years or just upgrade?”

CIRP found AirPods sit on a shorter replacement cycle than the iPhone itself, driven by exactly this mechanism:

  1. batteries wearing out

  2. buds getting lost (guilty).

AirPods are now one of the most frequently reordered items on Amazon - far from an occasional top-up.

A one-off sale essentially becomes a recurring one, without it ever being called (or considered) a β€œsubscription”.

2. The replacement always stays in-house

So a dead battery forces what gets replaced.

But lock-in decides what it's replaced with.

Path of least resistance is another pair of AirPods - it’s the ecosystem argument we’ve all heard before:

  • one-tap pairing via the H-chip and a protocol that’s closed to 3rd party devices

  • Handoff across every device (Macbook, iPad)

  • Spatial audio

  • Find My

Ditching all of it for Sony or Samsung means giving up the whole ecosystem experience, not just the earbuds, and most people never even weigh the trade-off.

Above Avalon estimated 61 million pairs sold in AirPods' first 3 years, with the installed base clearing 100 million people by 2021.

Each one now sits inside a repeating cycle where the only replacement is another pair of AirPods.

That's the flywheel.

Lock-in retains users and also re-sells them the same category every time the battery gives out. And by the time their battery dies out there's 1-2 generations' worth of upgrades that users can jump to.

3. How to sell a product that is β€œsolved”

Honestly. If we zoom out, AirPods stopped changing years ago.

AirPods Pro 1 landed ANC in 2019. (huge)

AirPods 3 added spatial audio in 2021. (also quite huge)

But every generation since has iterated at the margins

β†’ AirPods Pro 3 (2025) advertises 2x more noise cancellation than Pro 2

β†’ New generations are listed as "the most secure and best-fitting AirPods ever"

And the "what's new" keeps getting more niche.

β†’ An FDA-authorised hearing aid mode (for users with hearing loss).

β†’ A heart rate sensor in Pro 3 (fitness users).

β†’ 5-language Live Translation (travellers).

β†’ Sleep-triggered auto-pause (sleep-with-AirPodders).

β€œBest Fitting AirPods Ever”?

Each one is real and well-built - each one is just engineered for a narrower slice of the buyer base than the last.

None of it is why someone buys their first pair of AirPods.

But all of it exists to give someone who already owns a pair a few more plausible reasons to buy the next one right around the time that battery starts to show its age.

Rabbit Hole

The where: 3x high-signal resources to learn more

[8 minute read]

This one’s obviously an opinionated teardown written by the repairability community, but from a strategy/moats PoV it’s quite interesting

The new heart rate sensor is packed in so tight iFixit says there's no realistic way to replace it on its own - and this generation even glues the charging case shut, so the battery in there is just as unreachable as the ones in your ears.

"Essentially disposable by design."

[3 minute read]

"The wearables business is the size of a Fortune 300 company."

Tim Cook said it at Apple's February 2018 shareholder meeting - back then, #300 on the Fortune 500 was Alcoa, doing about $9.3 billion a year.

By the end of that same year, Cook had already upgraded the line to Fortune 200.

[4 minute read]

Bloomberg Intelligence's math: AirPods alone did $18 billion in a year - more than Nintendo, more than X, more than eBay or Airbnb's entire annual revenue.

Bloomberg's own follow-up call: at this pace, AirPods overtakes the iPad before the decade's end, becoming Apple's third-biggest product behind iPhone and Mac.

Where the viral "bigger than Nintendo" number everyone quotes originally comes from.

What did you think of today's edition?

Login or Subscribe to participate

Whenever you're ready, there are 3 ways we can help you:

Our flagship course on how to use free internet data to make better strategic decisions. Contains 5 years of strategy expertise, proven methods, and actionable tactics to accelerate your career with modern-day strategy skills.

We have a growing audience of 150,000+ strategists from top companies like Google, Meta, Atlassian, Stripe, and Netflix. Apply to feature your business in front of Strategy Breakdowns readers.

One of the most common questions we get asked is: β€œWhat tools do you use to run Strategy Breakdowns?” So, we’ve open-sourced our tech stack to give you an inside-look at exactly what tools we’re using to power each corner of this operation.

Let's brainstorm

Avatar

or to participate

You might also like: