Why founders love Vanta

• 1,000+ YC-backed founders have scaled faster with Vanta

• Vanta is one of the leading SMB Security Compliance on G2’s Grid Report

• 9/10 Startups recommend Vanta, based on our Net Promoter Score

“If we’d done everything manually, it would have cost us up to AUD$100k in time and resources. Partnering with Vanta has cut that by more than half.” — Anshul Jain, Co-Founder, Everlab.

By automating up to 90% of the work needed for SOC 2, ISO 27001, and more, Vanta has helped over 10,000 companies like Atlassian, Relevance AI and Everlab get compliant fast.

Your keyboard called - it’s taking a long weekend

We've been banging away on keyboards for 150 years. Wispr Flow finally delivers the no-edit confidence we've all been waiting for:

• 4× faster than typing. Dictate emails, docs, and DMs in real time - save precious hours every single week.

• AI auto-editing. Flow removes filler words, fixes grammar, and formats perfectly as you speak naturally.

• Works everywhere. No setup required. Use in Slack, ChatGPT, Notion, or any app seamlessly.

"This is the best AI product I've used since ChatGPT." — Rahul Vohra, CEO, Superhuman

_{Thank you for supporting our sponsors, who keep this newsletter free.}

Today I woke up and wondered “are most Strategy Breakdowns readers building B2B or B2C businesses?”

Logic says: just ask.

For reference:

• B2B (Business-to-Business)

  • Companies that sell products or services to other businesses.

  • E.g. business banking software, SEO agency

• B2C (Business-to-Consumer)

  • Companies that sell directly to individual consumers.

  • Examples: clothing brand, streaming platform

(If you vote in the poll you can see the results 👀)

Now then, onto today’s piece.

— Tom

How Instagram hacks perception

Chess Move

The what: A TLDR explanation of the strategy

In 2010, uploading photos on mobile was painful.

Developers were tasked with compressing, uploading, downloading and rendering high-resolution images on sluggish EDGE networks, across hundreds of different devices and carriers, assuming the connection didn't drop entirely.

Instagram co-founder Kevin Systrom came up with a crafty hack to make the app’s photo-sharing flow feel snappy and instant for the user on any network/device.

He applied a lesson from his time at Google's Gmail team: don't just optimise the speed of the technology, optimise the user’s perception of speed.

Gmail had pioneered something called "predictive loading" - pre-fetching users' inboxes while they typed their passwords, betting those who started typing would end up successfully logging in.

The result: inboxes appear to load instantaneously.

Applied to Instagram, instead of waiting for users to hit "Share" to upload images to their servers, they would begin uploading in the background the moment users selected a filter and moved to the caption screen.

By the time they finished typing and tapped "Post" the upload was already complete.

The result: images appear to post instantaneously.

This wasn't about faster uploading infrastructure - it was about hiding the processing during natural pauses in the user workflow.

Instagram didn't speed up uploads; they made users think they did.

Here’s why it worked (and how you can apply the same principle to your work):

Breakdown

The how: The strategic playbook boiled down to 3x key takeaways

1.  Anticipate what the user needs

Most apps at the time followed the same linear process: select photo → edit → write caption → hit share → then upload.

Instagram flipped this sequence, moving the heaviest computational work (uploading megabytes of image data) earlier in the flow.

The technical implementation involved splitting uploads into "Two round-trips”.

1. Immediately after filter selection, Instagram transmitted the image data while users wrote captions.

2. When users hit the “Share" button, Instagram simply registered the additional post metadata with the image on Instagram's servers and showed users the live post.

This created an illusion of instant publishing.

A single insight inspired this change: users who selected photos, applied filters, and reached the caption screen were exhibiting strong intent to share.

The team called this “betting on the outcome”.

The odds of posting were high enough to justify starting uploads immediately - even knowing some uploads would be cancelled.

The slight waste in bandwidth was well-worth the tradeoff for a significantly smoother and faster user experience.

2. Design for perceived speed, not just actual speed

Feeling fast matters as much as being fast.

While competitor’s were stuck grappling with network infrastructure improvements and compression algorithms, Instagram exploited natural pauses in user behaviour.

Users were focused elsewhere (typing captions, adding filters, selecting sharing options), so they didn't have to wait for the heavy-lifting computational work to happen.

Over time, they applied the ‘hiding the wait’ principle to every corner of the app.

Lesson: UX design can be just as powerful as engineering improvements for user-facing speed improvements.

3. UX as a competitive advantage

Instagram's speed hack wasn't just a nice-to-have feature - it became a decisive competitive moat during the platform's crucial early growth phase.

Instagram’s primary competitor Hipstamatic prioritised photography quality with high-resolution 1,536×1,536 pixel images.

Instagram constrained all uploads to 640×640 pixel square images. This wasn't a technical limitation - it was a strategic choice to simplify processing pipelines and complement their predictive upload system.

The speed advantage actually compounded over time.

Users who experienced Instagram's frictionless UX were more likely enjoy the app and continue frequently, which led to more content, which attracted more users.

Instagram grew fast:

• 25,000 users on launch day

• 1 million within 3 months

• 14 million users within 14 months

Their mobile-first, speed-optimised approach retained users with instant gratification without needing pixel-perfect image quality.

Universal truth: No one wants to use slow software.

The success of this UX pattern quickly became growth-hack lore.

Today, designing for perceived speed is a core principle of the world’s most successful products.

Netflix pre-loads the next episode.

YouTube buffers 30-60 seconds ahead.

Facebook News Feed pre-fetches HTML pages from links they predict you will click.

Whether you’re a B2B marketing agency or a B2C travel community, always anticipate and deliver what your users will likely need next.

Rabbit Hole

The where: 3x high-signal resources to learn more

Why Instagram is so fast at uploading photos ↗

[3 minute read]

The top HackerNews post from May 1st 2012.

All 94 slides from Mike Krieger’s presentation on “Secrets to Lightning Fast Mobile Design”.

Viewed 170k times - I’d consider that ‘viral’ for a humble slide deck.

Mobile App Development Tips from the CEO of Instagram (October 2011) ↗

[4 minute watch]

Nothing better than an early founder interview that’s still as relevant today as it was decades ago.

Reporter: “People talk about your application with true love - what were the elements you put into it that made it so popular?”

Kevin: “I think it’s actually what elements we didn’t put into it, we kept it really simple. I think the thing that sets us apart is we removed extraneous features. We focussed on speed of upload - a lot of people don’t consider that a feature but it’s very much a feature internally.”

(2012) Mark Zuckerberg “If you could buy Instagram, Foursquare, or Pinterest, which would you buy?” ↗

[8 minute read]

One of the wildest parts of this leaked internal conversation is Mark’s hypothesis that “Instagram can hurt us meaningfully without becoming a huge business though. For the others, if they become big we’ll just regret not doing them”.

He was 100% correct.

Instagram turned out to be more popular than Facebook, and would have hurt them tremendously if it remained independent.

Foursquare split into 2 products, shut one down, and the other (’Swarm’) makes $100m per year (Meta makes $500m+ per day).

Pinterest generates ~$4b per year, but is not (and will never be) a real threat to Meta’s core business.

That’s all for today’s breakdown - hope you enjoyed!

Got some super fun stuff in the pipeline. Can’t wait to share with y’all.

131 people are already early to the party.

— Tom

Whenever you're ready, there are 3 ways we can help you:

1. StrategyHub

Our flagship course on how to use free internet data to make better strategic decisions. Contains 5 years of strategy expertise, proven methods, and actionable tactics to accelerate your career with modern-day strategy skills.

2. Partnerships

We have a growing audience of 90,000+ strategists from top companies like Google, Meta, Atlassian, Stripe, and Netflix. Apply to feature your business in front of Strategy Breakdowns readers.

3. Tech stack

One of the most common questions we get asked is: “What tools do you use to run Strategy Breakdowns?” So, we’ve open-sourced our tech stack to give you an inside-look at exactly what tools we’re using to power each corner of this operation.